Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Devore v. Neosho Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv05039
Plaintiff:
Jerome Levi Devore
Defendant:
Neosho Police Department, Neosho Fire Department, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelums v. Newton County, Missouri et al
as 3:2021cv05036
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cecil Nelums
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Newton County, Missouri, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Newton County Ambulance District et al
as 3:2020cv05035
Defendant:
Newton County MO, Michael Barnett, Kelse Renner and others
Plaintiff:
Kristina Stockton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tarver v. Shelly et al
as 1:2018cv00281
Defendant:
C. Newton, Troy Shelly, R. Newton and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Tarver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agee v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv04044
Plaintiff:
Antonio M Agee
Defendant:
Jeremiah Reger, Steven Moritz, Parry Ramey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Jones et al
as 2:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Shannon Louise Miller
Defendant:
Justin Jones, CORIZON LLC, Hari Kapor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Doxley v. Newton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2015cv05074
Plaintiff:
Damien Duane Doxley
Defendant:
Newton County Sheriff's Department, Kenneth Copeland, Levens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pflanz v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2014cv00485
Petitioner:
Michael C. Pflanz
Respondent:
State of Missouri and Newton County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eddington v. Samuels et al
as 6:2013cv03438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Eddington
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Paul M Laird, Newton E Kendig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
