Cases 1 - 10 of 697
Smith v. Urquhart et al
as 3:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Mike Urquhart, Doug Thurman and Judge Jennifer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Cole
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, CoreCivic, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sexton
as 2:2024cv02431
Petitioner:
Travis Smith
Respondent:
David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Core Civic, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Correctional Health Care Companies, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Careathers v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Grady J Careathers
Defendant:
Officer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Bullard et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Sebastian Bullard and Kenneth Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gobble v. Lawson et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Charles Gobble
Defendant:
Kori Lawson, W. Smith, Centers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Harold Vernon Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Suggs v. Dewberry et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jesse Suggs
Defendant:
Wendy Dewberry, Kayla Smith and Quality Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. McFarlin et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Patrick McFarlin, Sheriff Hodges and Q.C.H.C. Medical Company/Entity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
