Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Thompson v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
Lawrence E. Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rufus v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Michael Rufus
Defendant:
Vasquez, Thompson, McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Thompson
Defendant:
Johnson, William Diehl, Kevin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Spoone et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Thompson
Defendant:
Sergeant Spoone, 1st Sergeant Franzen and Major Gregory Mcrae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Thompson, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. White et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Nedward Chadnezzar Fowler
Defendant:
Jasmine White, Ronald Slade, Andrew Wlag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dieffenbacher v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Paulo Vicente Dieffenbacher
Defendant:
Eric Young, Lori Nicholson, David Bauguess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Sean Price
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00732
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00657
Petitioner:
Eugene L. Thompson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
