Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Brown v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Juan V. Brown
Defendant:
Director, Missouri Dept. of Correction, Marvin Brannum, Unknown Hampton CO II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Bowles et al
as 4:2023cv01561
Plaintiff:
Dakota Pace
Defendant:
Jeremy Bowles, Tim Harris, Sheriff Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knowles v. Johnson
as 4:2023cv01550
Petitioner:
John V. Knowles, IV
Respondent:
Andy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. Johnson
as 4:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Willie J. Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
V. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bai v. USA
as 4:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Charles V. Bai
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Salinas et al v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Moreno Salinas
Defendant:
Stephan V. Clark, Meredith Unknown, Unknown Rangale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Tehum Care Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04149
Plaintiff:
Pati Simmons
Defendant:
Tehum Care Services, Inc. doing business as Corizon Health, Inc., Kavita Pendurthi, Mary A Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaca v. USA
as 4:2022cv00604
Petitioner:
Caesar V Vaca
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Key v. Doe et al
as 6:2022cv03173
Plaintiff:
Felix Key
Defendant:
John Doe, John 2 Doe, Jane Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Brewer
as 4:2022cv00145
Petitioner:
Richard V Cooper
Respondent:
Christopher Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
