Cases 1 - 10 of 869
Williams v. USA-2255
as 8:2024cv02750
Respondent:
USA-2255
Petitioner:
John Robert Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Morgan v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv02552
Defendant:
Warden and William S. Bohrer
Plaintiff:
Maurice Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. Morgan et al
as 1:2024cv02415
Defendant:
William Bohrer, Case Management Transfer Coordinatior MCTC, David Igbeara and others
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Respondent:
Mr. William Bailey and Mr. Brian Frosh
Petitioner:
Marquis Dionte Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02122
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Warren v. Baliley et al
as 1:2024cv02101
Defendant:
Bethany Roderer, T. PettyJohn, Stephanie Cyran and others
Plaintiff:
Sammie J. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenstry v. Bunn et al
as 1:2024cv02071
Defendant:
Yoshinori Araki, Robert Dean, Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
Trequan L. McKenstry and Lamar T. McKenstry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv02043
Defendant:
Krystin J Richarson, Daniel Register, State's Attorney Baltimore County and others
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
John Robert Williams, III
Defendant:
Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Norman et al
as 1:2024cv02007
Defendant:
Dellisanti, Deborah Norman, David M. Brokile and others
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
