Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Adam Goldman v. Sheriff of Polk County, Florida, et al
as 22-11308
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant / Appellee: SHERIFF OF POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA, HOWARD L. DIMMIG, II, Public Defender, PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Goldman v. Dimmig et al
as 8:2022cv00858
Plaintiff: Adam Goldman
Defendant: Howard L. Dimmig, II, Grace Bowles, Brian W. Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00788
Plaintiff: Adam Goldman
Defendant: Grady Judd, Sgt. Crandall, Sgt. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff: Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant: Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Winn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv13047
Defendant: Carla Gross, Crawford, Mr. Zummer and others
Plaintiff: Lance Adam Goldman
Goldman et al v. Winn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv12011
Respondent: Michigan Parole Board, Depart of Corrections and Thomas Winn
Petitioner: Lance Adam Goldman
Goldman v. Winn et al
as 2:2019cv11856
Defendant: T. Winn, M. Bell and A. Pratt
Plaintiff: Lance Adam Goldman
Goldman v. Dickenson et al
as 5:2019cv11711
Respondent: Jeffrey Baker and Rosanna Dickenson
Petitioner: Lance Adam Goldman
Goldman et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv11597
Plaintiff: Lance Adam Goldman and Carrie Shoemaker
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections
Goldman v. Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv11380
Respondent: Department of Corrections
Petitioner: Lance Adam Goldman

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?