Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Alexander #182285 v. Bush et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
John Allen Alexander #182285
Defendant:
Jeremy Bush, Barbra Storey, Jeffrey Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Monte et al
as 2:2024cv10950
Plaintiff:
Chad Alexander Smith
Defendant:
Monte, Perkins, John Doe and others
Jones #617568 v. MTU Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
MTU Correctional Facility and Unknown Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuhl v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alexander Kuhl
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10370
Petitioner:
Evan Alexander Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Wynder #377975 v. Moore
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Alexander Carson Wynder #377975
Defendant:
Unknown Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Michigan Department of Corrections, Justin Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Alexander #182285 v. Rewerts
as 2:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
John Allen Alexander #182285
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steanhouse v. Schroeder
as 5:2023cv12702
Petitioner:
Alexander Jeremy Steanhouse
Respondent:
Amy Schroeder and Sarah Schroeder
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
