Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
J. W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dunklin County, State of Missouri, Steven Geary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. USA
as 6:2023cv03393
Petitioner:
Alexander Monday Coleman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harmon v. Downing et al
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Harmon
Defendant:
Alexander L. Downing, Unknown Wells, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Nathan Waibl, Unknown Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Skaggs et al
as 4:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Ashley Skaggs, Daniel Francis and Unknown Cornelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Kennon et al
as 4:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Jimmy Kennon, Lloyd Russell, Unknown Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Gettinger
as 4:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Rachel Gettinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Paine et al
as 4:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Unknown Paine, Jennifer Price and Brian Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Yates
as 4:2022cv00834
Petitioner:
Devontay Alexander
Respondent:
John P. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Austin v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv04106
Plaintiff:
Alexander N Austin
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
