Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Reller v. Winch et al
as 5:2024cv05029
Plaintiff:
Dustin Reller
Defendant:
Donell Winch, Robert Yantis, Wade Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Sogn et al
as 4:2024cv04020
Plaintiff:
Tristen Anderson
Defendant:
Jon Sogn, Koln Fink and Robin Houwman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson
as 4:2023cv04136
Petitioner:
Kareen Anderson
Defendant:
FPC Yankton, William Odonel, Kortan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Sullivan
as 4:2023cv04073
Petitioner:
Rocky Dan Anderson, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Sullivan and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pulliam v. Andrews et al
as 5:2022cv05056
Plaintiff:
Charles Aloyious Pulliam
Defendant:
Correction Officer Andrews, Lt. Wilson, Sgt. Davees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daly v. Thom et al
as 5:2022cv05051
Plaintiff:
William H. Daly
Defendant:
Chief Kevin Thom, Commander Yantis, Captain Munch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko, Dan Sullivan, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Thorn et al
as 5:2021cv05084
Plaintiff:
Joel Luther Baker
Defendant:
Sheriff Thorn, Commander Yantis, Lt. Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2021cv04082
Defendant:
Sgt. Nicholas Rodriguez, Officer Nicholas Anderson, Officer Brent McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Michael Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. The State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2021cv04031
Defendant:
Elhers, Tashara Lynn Anderson and State of South Dakota
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ellis Teague, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
