Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Phifer v. Maricopa County Defense Team et al
as 2:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Maricopa County Defense Team, Scott Boncoskey, Todd Paul Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa #350727 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Petitioner:
Alfred Eric Caraffa
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baumbach #278913 v. King et al
as 2:2023cv02466
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Baumbach
Defendant:
Jean King, Edmund Mitchell, Angel Merriman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. Monarez
as 2:2023cv02395
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Acosta
Respondent:
Unknown Monarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ruiz v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv02262
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luis Felipe Cruz Lopez, Gabriela Oceguera, Hector Salomon Galindo Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Angel P Ruiz
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Centurion Health Incorporated, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
Angel Scott
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. Hudson
as 2:2023cv01909
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Acosta
Respondent:
Unknown Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hammond v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01460
Plaintiff:
Angel Hammond
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Clint Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez #147145 v. Pima County Jail
as 4:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Ramirez
Defendant:
Pima County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
