Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Holmes v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Holmes
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Missouri, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Gregston et al
as 4:2023cv01482
Plaintiff:
Reginald Austin
Defendant:
Matthew Gregston, Larry Wentzell and Eric Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. The City of Blue Springs Police Department
as 4:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Austin E Reese
Defendant:
The City of Blue Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pierpoint v. USA
as 4:2023cv00408
Petitioner:
Austin J Pierpoint
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Buckner v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Earnest L. Buckner
Defendant:
A. Shaffer, M. Golain, D. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett II v. Short
as 4:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Dewey Austin Barnett II
Defendant:
Brenda Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryson v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
Lyrick Bryson
Defendant:
Jay Cassidy, Brandon Hatch, Austin Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv04106
Plaintiff:
Alexander N Austin
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Short et al
as 4:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Dewey Austin Barnett, II
Defendant:
Brenda Short, Christopher Rulo and Jefferson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Allen et al
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Keon Allen
Defendant:
Jessie Allen, Austin Ketchum, Lakeisha Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
