Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Pittman v. Ohno
as 5:2024ct03036
Plaintiff:
Austin Reid Pittman
Defendant:
Officer Ohno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kramer v. USA
as 7:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Joshua Austin Kramer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Litchfield v. USA
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Austin Tyler Litchfield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Whitted v. Patterson et al
as 5:2023ct03311
Plaintiff:
Mario D. Whitted
Defendant:
Austin K. Patterson, Christina Smith and Det. Terry Dimmery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrnside v. Griffin et al
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Austin Amos Byrnside
Defendant:
Lowell Griffin, Dylan Rollins, Brandon Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linder v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maurice Linder
Defendant:
Donald G Brown, FNU Luna, FNU Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linder v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maurice Linder
Defendant:
Donald G Brown, FNU Luna, FNU Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02175
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Pettis v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Austin Devon Pettis
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Smith, FNU Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Charlotte-Meck Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
William Henry Peoples, lll
Defendant:
Charlotte-Meck Police Department, Public Defenders Office, State of North Carolina Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
