Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Michael Whirlwind Horse, Jr. v. Alex Reyes, et al
as 24-3588
Petitioner:
Michael R. Whirlwind Horse, Jr.
Respondent:
Marty Jackley, The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and Warden Alex Reyes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3259
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Donald East v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-2997
Defendant:
Brent Fluke, Warden Mike Durfee State Prison, Alex Reyes, Acting Warden Mike Durfee State Prison and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Plaintiff:
Donald East
Michael Merrival, Jr. v. Warden Alex Reyes
as 24-2812
Respondent:
Alex Reyes, Acting Warden
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Merrival, Jr.
Whirl Wind Horse v. Lincoln County et al
as 4:2024cv04148
Defendant:
Alex Reyes, TeAndre Archambeau, Cory Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Whirl Wind Horse, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Olage v. Lawrence County et al
as 4:2024cv04135
Defendant:
Kellie Wasko, Lawrence County, Alex Reyes and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Olage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whirlwind Horse v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04105
Respondent:
Marty Jackley and Warden Alex Reyes
Petitioner:
Michael R. Whirlwind Horse, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krumback v. Reyes
as 4:2024cv03100
Petitioner:
Jason Krumback
Respondent:
Alex Reyes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Reyes et al
as 5:2024cv05032
Respondent:
Attorney General of South Dakota and Alex Reyes
Petitioner:
Nakota Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
