Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jefferson (ID 44578) v. Ahrens et al
as 5:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jefferson
Defendant:
Jace Ahrens, Allen Mason, Matthew Moore and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Reid et al
as 2:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Marc Allen Mason
Defendant:
Tim Reid, Joel Richardson and As Yet Unidentified Psychiatric Staff of Transceiver Implant Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Unknown Sheriff of Randall County, Texas et al
as 2:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Marc Allen Mason
Defendant:
Unknown Sheriff of Randall County, Texas, Unamed Psychiatric/Medical, Aryan Brotherhood of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Richardson
as 2:2013cv00051
Petitioner:
Marc Allen Mason
Respondent:
Joel Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Lacy et al
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Marc Allen Mason
Defendant:
Tim Lacy, Unamed Medical/Health Maintenance Organization, Brenda NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Parrie, et al
as 2:2013cv00046
Defendant:
Marc Allen Mason, W Parrie, Kandy Lynn Antrikin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Richardson
as 2:2013cv00043
Petitioner:
Marc Allen Mason
Respondent:
Joel Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Farren et al
as 2:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Marc Allen Mason
Defendant:
James Farren, NFN Morris and Joel W Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Richardson et al
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Marc Allen Mason
Defendant:
Joel W Richardson, Jerry Bigham and Clay Houdeshell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
