Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Armstrong v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00257
Petitioner:
Andrew Armstrong
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARMSTRONG v. NEAL
as 1:2019cv00993
Petitioner:
ANDREW ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
RON NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jay Nottingham v. Joel Finsterwald, et al
as 13-10398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY ANTHONY NOTTINGHAM, also known as Jay Nottingham, also known as Jay Thrasher, also known as James Andrew Armstrong, also known as Jeff Andrew Montgomery, also known as Jeffrey Montgomery, also known as Jay Dillan, also known as Sterling Armstrong Harr
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL FINSTERWALD, Sheriff of Wheeler County, CARRIE GAINES, Wheeler County Jailk Administrator and WHEELER COUNTY
Jay Nottingham v. Joel Finsterwald
as 13-10398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Anthony Nottingham, also known as Jay Nottingham, also known as Jay Thrasher, also known as James Andrew Armstrong, also known as Jeff Andrew Montgomery, also known as Jeffrey Montgomery, also known as Jay Dillan, also known as Sterling Armstrong
Defendant / Appellee:
Joel Finsterwald, Sheriff of Wheeler County, Carrie Gaines, Wheeler County Jailk Administrator and Wheeler County
Armstrong v. Petta et al
as 8:2012cv02311
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew Armstrong
Defendant:
Joseph Petta, Daniel Dickerman, Thomas Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jay Nottingham v. Joel Richardson, et al
as 11-11027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY ANTHONY NOTTINGHAM, also known as Sterling Harrison, also known as James Andrew Armstrong, also known as Jay Thrasher, also known as Hunter O'Brian, also known as Jay A. Notingham, also known as Jay Anthony Nuttingham, also known as Jay Anthony Mottin
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL RICHARDSON, Sheriff Randall County, TIM LACEY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - Medical Contractor for Randall County Sheriff's Department, SCOTT DAVIS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - Medical Department of Randall County Sheriff's Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
