Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Duncan et al
as 6:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Stacy A. Scott
Defendant:
Daiquiri D. Duncan, Matthew Harper, Steven E. Frybarger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.S. v. Duncan et al
as 6:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
S.S.
Defendant:
Daiquiri D. Duncan, Matthew Harper, Steven E. Frybarger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Ward et al
as 5:2020cv00045
Defendant:
Moore, FNUK Grieco, Jack Koon and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Phillip Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Shepard et al
as 5:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Asst. Commissioner Alan Watson, Regional Director Scott Crickman, South Region Residential ReEntry Office and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Phillip Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STAMPELOS et al
as 4:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CHARLES STAMPELOS, JAMES HANKINSON, RON FLURY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Power
as 9:2015cv00061
Petitioner:
Angela Williams
Respondent:
William Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cedric Kimbrough v. Warden, et al
as 14-15279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC KIMBROUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, ANGELA WILLIAMS, J. SINGLETON and others
KIMBROUGH v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC KIMBROUGH
Defendant:
CEDRIC TAYLOR, ANGELA WILLIAMS, J SINGLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANNER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2013cv00359
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE BRANNER, JR
Defendant:
ANGELA WILLIAMS, DAVIS, ESTWICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
