Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Way v. Clayton Prison et al
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Raheem Way
Defendant:
Clayton Prison, Probation and Parole, State of New Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Way v. Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Raheem Way
Defendant:
Probation and Parole, State of New Mexico, Vestula Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Apodaca v. Curry County Adult Detention Center
as 2:2020cv00775
Respondent:
Curry County Adult Detention Center
Petitioner:
Damian Apodaca
Defendant:
Wesley Waller and Lance Pyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto et al v. Governor of the State of New Mexico, et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Petitioner:
Patrick Hopkins, Dainte D Sanders, Jonathan Duran and others
Respondent:
Governor of the State of New Mexico and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Apodaca v. Warden et al
as 1:2019cv01209
Plaintiff:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Defendant:
Rosa Warden, CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Apodaca v. Judd et al
as 1:2019cv00571
Respondent:
Alisha Tafoya-Lucero, LNU FNU and Betty Judd
Petitioner:
Dr. Victor Andrew Apodaca, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Apodaca v. LNU et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Jennifer Valdez, Betty Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apodaca v. Wilkie et al
as 1:2019cv00147
Respondent:
Robert L. Wilkie, United States Attorney and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Petitioner:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Apodaca v. Bowen et al
as 1:2018cv00671
Respondent:
FNU Brennan, GEO Group, Inc., Susana Hutchinson and others
Petitioner:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
