Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nero v. Governor of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Scott Nero
Defendant:
Governor of Oklahoma and Attorney General State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harcourt v. Dennis et al
as 5:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
William David Harcourt
Respondent:
Chad Dennis and Attorney General State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Draper et al v. United States et al
as 5:2019cv00128
Plaintiff:
Danny Armstrong, Cleve Billings, Mark Schemm and others
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, State of Oklahoma, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Draper et al v. United States et al
as 3:2018cv01047
Plaintiff:
Danny Armstrong, Cleve Billings, Mark Schemm and others
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, State of Oklahoma, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Agofsky v. Jones, et al
as 12-6311
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and E. SCOTT PRUITT, Attorney General, State of Oklahoma
Magnan v. Workman, et al
as 11-7072
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MAGNAN
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and SCOTT PRUITT, Attorney General, State of Oklahoma
Lowery, et al v. Edmondson, et al
as 09-7103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. LOWERY, JAMES ERNEST LANE and ELCO Q. PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General State of Oklahoma, JUSTIN JONES, Director Oklahoma Department of Corretions, DEBBIE L. MORTON and others
Lowery, et al v. Edmondson, et al
as 09-7081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. LOWERY, JAMES ERNEST LANE and ELCO Q. PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General State of Oklahoma, JUSTIN JONES, Director Oklahoma Department of Corretions, DEBBIE L. MORTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
