Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Robinson v. Attorney General for the State of Alaska et al
as 3:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Jayson Sterling Robinson
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alaska, Superior Court for the State of Alaska at Anchorage and Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00813
Petitioner:
Alfredo Caraffa
Respondent:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of Alaska and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slaikeu v. Moses et al
as 3:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Alexander Slaikeu
Defendant:
Richard Moses, Trey Taylor, Attorney General for the State of Alaska and others
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrence v. Attorney General for the State of Alaska
as 3:2014cv00134
Petitioner:
Patrick H. Torrence
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ignacio Ponce v. Kodiak, Alaska, et al
as 14-35048
Petitioner - Appellant:
IGNACIO PONCE
Respondent - Appellee:
KODIAK, ALASKA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis
Respondent:
State of Alaska and The Attorney General of the State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jarnig v. Driver
as 1:2012cv02588
Petitioner:
Jonathan Neal Jarnig
Respondent:
Joseph Driver and Attorney General of the State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Bradley
Defendant:
State of Alaska and The Attorney General of the State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
