Cases 1 - 10 of 457
Crowe v. Harrell et al
as 1:2024cv01468
Defendant:
D Harrell and L Molette
Plaintiff:
Eric B Crowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02518
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joseph v. R B D C et al
as 3:2024cv01016
Defendant:
Lt Jackson, Capt Frost, Nurse Frost and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. F C I Pollock et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Derek A Smith
Defendant:
F B O P and Warden F C I Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garrison et al v. Orleans Parish Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv01766
Defendant:
Susan B Hutson, Orleans Parish Justice Center and Wexford Health Companies
Plaintiff:
Darius Jamal Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Pool et al
as 5:2024cv00824
Defendant:
L Hill and B Pool
Plaintiff:
Donald Ashley, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Wallace et al
as 2:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Eddie Richards
Defendant:
Reed Wallace, Travis Day, Medical Director Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Modisett v. F B O P et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael Antwaine Modisett
Defendant:
FBOP, Agents and F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Department of Health
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Jones
Defendant:
Department of Health, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health Systems, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
