Cases 1 - 10 of 398
Pena v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv01464
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pena
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant:
A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Jerald K. Graber et al
as 4:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Carl W. Robertson
Defendant:
Jerald K. Graber, Terry Gaiser and Hazel B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roberts and Julian Roberts
Defendant:
Sidney B Jones, Lisa Johnson and Dorchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jacques v. Jung et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Jung, B. Jones and Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. David et al
as 5:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nunez
Defendant:
J. David, B. Jones and J. Hollis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Goods v. Baughman et al
as 2:2023cv02790
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
David Baughman, C. Lacy, B. Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NUNEZ v. DAVID et al
as 3:2023cv24725
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NUNEZ
Defendant:
J DAVID, B JONES and J HOLLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03512
Plaintiff:
Demond Haynes
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
