Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daniels v. People of the State Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Daniels
Defendant:
People of the State Kentucky, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Walters et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Walters, Patrick Covello, Laura Forsterer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Latham v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latham
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Filipello, C. Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Garcia v. Padgett et al
as 2:2021cv00875
Defendant:
M. Rhode, B. Holmes, B. Stacy and others
Plaintiff:
William Garcia and William Patrick Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cole v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 3:2020cv06400
Defendant:
B. Stacy, R. McFadden-Jensen, R. Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Stein Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Castro v. Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv01259
Defendant:
K. Prather, B. Stacy, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cole v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 2:2018cv02596
Defendant:
B. Stacy, K. Hoffman, R. McFadden-Jensen and others
Plaintiff:
Stein Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. McFadden-Jensen et al
as 2:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
Lambert G. Chambers
Defendant:
R. McFadden-Jensen, B. Stacy, C. Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Rouse v. Terry Powlde, et al
as 09-6205
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIMOTHY DAWAYNE ROUSE
Defendant:
TERRY POWLDE, Police Chief, Fulton City Police Department, BENNEY DUNCCAN, Police Officer, Fulton City Police Department, RICHARD L. MAJORS, District County Attorney, Fulton County Attorney Office and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. STACY, Commonwealth Attorney, Fulton County Circuit Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
