Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 130
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff: Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant: Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. AKANDE et al
as 1:2024cv00667
Plaintiff: MARQUESE BERRY
Defendant: AKANDE, JAIL COMMANDER, ADEOJO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff: BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant: JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner: JACKIE BERRY
Respondent: TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. KLYAIC et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff: SYMONE LAURICE BERRY
Defendant: KLYAIC, NICHOLS and JULIE STOUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. HORTH et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner: MELVIN WES HARNEY
Respondent: GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARIES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01044
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff: MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant: ZACHARY SCHULTZ, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00217
Petitioner: SYMONE BERRY
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00135
Petitioner: SYMONE BERRY
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?