Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Bowen v. Sidney Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Bowen
Defendant:
Sidney Police Department, Hayden Bronne, Joseph Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meinke et al v. Stammitti et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Nolan P. Meinke and Jose Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Philip R. Stammitti, Captain Hammond Jack, Administrator James Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bowen et al
as 4:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Clifford D. Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr., ODRC Director Annette Chambers Smith, Jeff Mustard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Filing Error
as 5:2023cv00406
Petitioner:
robert bowen
Respondent:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Watson
as 5:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Robert Bowen
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv03725
Petitioner:
Clifford J Bowen
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Sparks et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant:
Sparks, Theodore Jackson, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Remish et al
as 4:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
Aaron Woodson
Defendant:
Mr. Remish, Mr. Jackson, Warden Richard Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swain v. Bowen, Jr.
as 4:2021cv02190
Petitioner:
Sean Swain
Respondent:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
