Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Byrd v. Cisco et al
as 8:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ivey Nicole Byrd
Defendant:
Lt Cisco, Sgt Capps, Judge Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bowens-Green v. James
as 4:2022cv04291
Petitioner:
Marvin Bowens Green and Marvin Bowens-Green
Respondent:
Tanya James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nero v. Ray et al
as 8:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
JQuwan M. Nero
Defendant:
Patricia Ray, Willie Sweat, Nurse Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brown v. Sumter-Lee Regional Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00670
Defendant:
Lt. Reddick, Sr. Cpl. Abraham, Lt. John Shirah and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. North Charleston Police Department, The et al
as 2:2018cv03494
Plaintiff:
Shamika Bowens
Defendant:
Officer Mark Nix, Officer Wilson Bishop and North Charleston Police Department, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowens v. North Charleston Police Department, The et al
as 2:2018cv03493
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Bowens
Defendant:
Officer Mark Nix, Officer Wilson Bishop and North Charleston Police Department, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowens v. USA
as 6:2018cv01702
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dexter Leon Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bennett et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2018cv01148
Plaintiff:
Devoun Bennett , Kelvin Bowen , Dexter Crawford and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Larry Cartledge and Dennis Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Williams
as 1:2018cv00620
Petitioner:
Kelvin Michael Bowen, Jr.
Respondent:
Randall Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowens-Green v. Williams
as 4:2018cv00155
Petitioner:
Marvin Bowens- Green
Respondent:
Randall Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
