Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Dixon v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Respondent:
Mr. William Bailey and Mr. Brian Frosh
Petitioner:
Marquis Dionte Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. Baliley et al
as 1:2024cv02101
Defendant:
Bethany Roderer, T. PettyJohn, Stephanie Cyran and others
Plaintiff:
Sammie J. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Suire v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv02200
Defendant:
Bailey
Plaintiff:
David Myron Suire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Howe v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2024cv01896
Defendant:
Carolyn Scruggs, William Bailey, J. Phillip Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Howe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Forbes v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Richard Forbes
Defendant:
Medical Supervisor and Warden Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01415
Defendant:
Unnamed Officers, Carolyn J. Scruggs, John Doe Officer #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Miles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ridgley et al v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
John Ridgley and Brandon Sweetman
Defendant:
Warden and William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sorrick
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Howe v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Howe
Defendant:
Carolyn Scruggs, Annie D. Harvey, J. Philip Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DePaola v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Eric DePaola
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, Annie D. Harvey, F. Todd Taylor, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
