Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Jennings v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00315
Plaintiff: Kenneth Jennings
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, Mack A. Bailey, Jr., Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff: Alphonso Bell
Defendant: Williams, Moore, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff: M.B.
Defendant: United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Bell v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff: Alphonso Bell
Defendant: Bailey, Williams and Brockington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff: M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant: Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00072
Plaintiff: Craig Bailey
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelligar v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Anthony Wade Nelligar
Defendant: C. Bailey, Major Little, Lieutenant L. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelligar v. Bailey et al
as 7:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Anthony Wade Nelligar
Defendant: Officer C. Bailey, Major Little, Lieutenant L. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DreamyLove v. Richardson et al
as 2:2023cv00616
Plaintiff: Quesha Keliah DreamyLove and Elijah Montrell Maven
Defendant: Richardson, Kayogera and Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. USA
as 3:2023cv00649
Petitioner: Janeen Linda Bailey
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?