Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Coleman, David v. Sgt. Pierre et al
as 9:2024cv80422
Plaintiff:
David G. Coleman
Defendant:
Sgt. Pierre, Officer Barber, Officer Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
PEAVY v. BARBER et al
as 5:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PEAVY and MIKHAI AL-QUADI
Defendant:
BARBER, HUBBARD, K JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
J. Thompson, M. Ledoux, J. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Prummell, et al
as 2:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, Tamantha Poulton, Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARBER et al v. JUSTICE et al
as 4:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
LARRY BARBER, MATTHEW LEVI FAISON and ELBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
ODELL JUSTICE, JANET YELLEN, SARAH L KULL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaya Cruz et al v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2022cv20314
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Amaya Cruz, Christian Pallidine and Angel Jae Torres Bucci
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Daniel Junior, Captain J Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bayon v. Barber et al
as 5:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
Tom Barber, Department of Justice and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barber v. Medical Department et al
as 2:2020cv00693
Defendant:
Medical Department, Cherin Alderdioe, Annett Alderman and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Junior Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBER v. MEDICAL
as 5:2020cv00185
Defendant:
MEDICAL
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JUNIOR BARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Medical
as 2:2020cv00465
Defendant:
Medical
Plaintiff:
Charles Junior Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
