Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Goins v. Apker et al
as 4:2013cv00295
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harold Goins, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Wyonna Mixon, Susan McClintock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gill v. Jones et al
as 4:2011cv00505
Plaintiff:
Rodney Darrell Gill
Defendant:
Unknown Jones and Unknown Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galligan v. Apker et al
as 4:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Galligan
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Unknown Barnhart, Unknown Snodgrass and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter v. Apker et al
as 4:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Leroy Porter
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Unknown McClintoc, Jonathan Barnhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sidney v. Winn et al
as 4:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
John Edward Sidney
Defendant:
Louis W Winn, B Katshor, C Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graves v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Graves
Defendant:
Unknown Ryan, Designation and Computation Center, Central Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rice v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv00585
Plaintiff:
William Edward Rice
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Craig Apker, Unknown Beckwith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dunlap v. Apker et al
as 4:2009cv00472
Plaintiff:
Horace L Dunlap
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Unknown Barnhart and Alphonso Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Apker, et al
as 4:2009cv00287
Plaintiff:
Corey D Jones
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Barnhart, S. Hollenbaek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pardue v. 2 nd shift unknown shu officers et al
as 4:2009cv00260
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pardue
Defendant:
2 nd shift unknown shu officers, Walker, Bossler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
