Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BYRD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BYRD and Al-Tariq Sharif Ali Byrd
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, CHIEF DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv01823
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Superintendent and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Barton Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barton v. USA
as 1:2020cv01230
Petitioner:
Reginald Lynn Barton, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barton, III v. Pike County Correctional Facility
as 4:2019cv02104
Petitioner:
Harry James Barton, III
Respondent:
Pike County Correctional Facility and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosa-Diaz v. Harry et al
as 1:2017cv02215
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rosa-Diaz
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, B. Ritchey, Jennifer Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartone v. Overmyer et al
as 1:2015cv02142
Petitioner:
Gary Bartone
Respondent:
Michael D. Overmyer, Stefanie J. Salavantis and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARTONE v. TOOLE et al
as 1:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
GARY BARTONE
Defendant:
MICHAEL TOOLE, TINA GARTLEY, CHRISTOPHER KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. ALLIED SECURITY HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv04684
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
ALLIED SECURITY HOLDINGS, LLC, ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES, PREIT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv01251
Plaintiff:
Robert A Barton
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sistrunk v. Linbaugh et al
as 3:2012cv00864
Plaintiff:
Lamarr Sistrunk
Defendant:
Linbaugh, Barbara H Nixon, Janna Tallo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
