Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Battle v. Christensen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00289
Petitioner: Bernard Battle
Respondent: Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BATTLE v. KAIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01682
Plaintiff: ISSA BATTLE
Defendant: MARTIN D. KAIL, JOSEPH NOVAKOWSKI, DAVID LINCOLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TORRES v. BATTLE et al
as 5:2021cv01417
Plaintiff: JOSE E. RENTAS TORRES
Defendant: NAKHEIM N. BATTLE and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. USA
as 2:2020cv00695
Plaintiff: ISSA BATTLE
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01298
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BATTLE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2014cv01961
Plaintiff: CRAIG BATTLE
Defendant: MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv01761
Plaintiff: JONATHAN BATTLES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv04116
Plaintiff: SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTLES v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00178
Petitioner: RICKY BATTLES
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL and ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THURSTON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM (P.P.S.) et al
as 2:2012cv00614
Plaintiff: DARYL THURSTON
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM (P.P.S.), GIORLA, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (C.F.C.F.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?