Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Byrd v. Cisco et al
as 8:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ivey Nicole Byrd
Defendant:
Lt Cisco, Sgt Capps, Judge Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Baxter v. Beaufort County et al
as 9:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Baxter
Defendant:
Beaufort County, Philip Foot, Quandara Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Baxter et al
as 5:2021cv00907
Defendant:
Jerry Adger, Karen Walto, Thomas Hallam and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Witherspoon v. Matthews et al
as 9:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jarode Jermaine Witherspoon
Defendant:
Johnny A Matthews, NFN Baxter, CIS Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al
as 2:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
James Tinsley
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services, Nikki Haley, Larry Ray Patton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tant v. Frick et al
as 3:2015cv03001
Plaintiff:
David Ray Tant
Defendant:
William Frick , South Carolina Office of the Attorney General , South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramadan v. FBOP et al
as 5:2013cv02701
Plaintiff:
Saied Mousa Ramadan
Defendant:
FBOP, FBOP Director Samuels, Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baxter v. Arwood et al
as 2:2012cv01005
Plaintiff:
Lentavis Denard Baxter
Defendant:
Freddie Arwood, Bruce Bryant, Donna Lesslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. Sutton et al
as 0:2010cv00847
Plaintiff:
Baxter Felix Vinson
Defendant:
Sutton, Dr Walls, Larry Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. Sutton et al
as 1:2010cv00847
Plaintiff:
Baxter Felix Vinson
Defendant:
Sutton, Dr Walls, Larry Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
