Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sivak v. Bennet et al
as 3:2023cv06248
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennet and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Banks v. Bennet et al
as 2:2023cv05994
Plaintiff:
Rodney Banks
Defendant:
Officer Bennet, Officer Sandoval, Officer Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Banks v. Officer Bennet et al
as 2:2023cv03528
Plaintiff:
Rodney Banks
Defendant:
Officer Bennet, Officer Sandoval, Officer Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Martinez Detention Facility Medical Staff, et al.
as 3:2021cv01846
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Emanuel Jeremiah Pitts
Defendant:
Martinez Detention Facility Medical Staff, Catuza, West County Detention Facility Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenjuan De Adams v. R. Savage et al
as 2:2019cv00476
Defendant:
H. Tillman, G. Arnett, Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Kenjuan De Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawes v. Bennet et al
as 3:2017cv05839
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Hawes
Defendant:
Eva Bennet and Jose H. Varela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diparra v. Bennet et al
as 3:2010cv02454
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Diparra
Defendant:
Bennet, ., Matthew Cate, Thomas Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennet v. Button et al
as 4:2010cv03775
Plaintiff:
McRay Bennet
Defendant:
M. Button, M. Gonzalez, S. Deathriage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neufer v. Yates, et al.
as 1:2009cv01065
Plaintiff:
Marc Neufer
Defendant:
James A. Yates, James Bennet, D. Hatten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez, et al v. Najera, et al
as 3:2006cv01261
Plaintiff:
Victor Martinez
Defendant:
Hector Najera, Robert Culley, Anthony Cerone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
