Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Butler et al v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2019cv02171
Defendant:
Lonnie Oliver, Dorina Varner, J. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremey Melvin and Shariff Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emory v. Mooney et al
as 4:2016cv01892
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Emory
Defendant:
Vincent F. Mooney, Morris, Bilger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Husband v. Malakoski et al
as 3:2014cv01146
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
J. Malakoski, S. Argueta, J. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mack v. Bilger et al
as 3:2013cv02192
Plaintiff:
David A. Mack
Defendant:
Robert Bilger, Tabb-Bickle, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Short v. Williams et al
as 4:2010cv02451
Plaintiff:
Lenny Short
Defendant:
Curtis A. Williams, Robert Bilger and Trogan Boiler Incorporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Olsheskie et al
as 3:2009cv01742
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brown
Defendant:
David A. Olsheskie, B.A. Bledsoe, Mail Room Clerk's-USP Lewisburg, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Paluch v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv01522
Plaintiff:
James A. Paluch, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, John S. Shaffer, William D. Sprenkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLAIN v. KORMANIC et al
as 2:2009cv00691
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KORMANIC, PAUL K. SMEAL, LISA G. HOLLZBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Beard et al
as 3:2009cv00581
Plaintiff:
Gary Hughes
Defendant:
J Beard, S. Lawler, R Bilger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sassaman v. Mifflin County Correctional Facility Staff
as 3:2007cv00382
Plaintiff:
Raymond James Sassaman
Defendant:
Mifflin County Correctional Facility Staff, Zook, Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
