Cases 1 - 10 of 152
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spears v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Darrell Spears
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Nick Smith, Henry Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lucas Bradley Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Murray, Paul Monk, Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Price, III
Defendant:
James Brazier, Donald Valenza, Bill Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
