Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Cochran v. Wood et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood, Major Eric Smith, Sgt Josh Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Coweta County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Coweta County Sheriff's Office, Josh Joyner, Debra Found and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BINGHAM V. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL
as 5:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BINGHAM
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH PRIVATE HEALTHCARE FOR PRISONERS and TRACY JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Bingham v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Randall Bingham
Defendant:
Georgia Dept. of Corrections, Wellpath Private Healthcare for Prisoners and Tracy Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Sampson
as 4:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Randall Bingham
Respondent:
Warden Gregory Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEGRIN v. MYERS et al
as 7:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
Warden MYERS, Deputy Warden MARCUS, Deputy Warden DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Inch et al
as 4:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Randall Bingham
Defendant:
Mark Inch, United State Probation and Steven Ricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BINGHAM v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BINGHAM
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, KAREN CHARLES and TONJA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BINGHAM v. TAYLOR et al
as 5:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BINGHAM
Defendant:
CEDRIC TAYLOR, SMITH and JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
