Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Blackwell v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00827
Petitioner:
Berry Joseph Blackwell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blackwell v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00318
Petitioner:
Devin Blackwell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLACKWELL v. TRUEBLOOD et al
as 2:2017cv00407
Plaintiff:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
S. JULIAN, HEATHER MATA, E. TRUEBLOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BLACKWELL v. TRUEBLOOD et al
as 2:2017cv00363
Petitioner:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Respondent:
S. JULIAN, HEATHER MATA, E. TRUEBLOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLACKWELL v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00241
Petitioner:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLACKWELL v. ALVEY
as 3:2014cv00158
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
WILLIAM Q. BLACKWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACKWELL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2013cv01260
Petitioner:
DAMON BLACKWELL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. HIERONYMUS et al
as 1:2012cv00919
U.S. Marshal Service:
BRIAN L. ALDRIDGE
Defendant:
JORDAN BLACKWELL, KEVIN EARLEY, NOEL GAERTNER and others
DEA:
JOHN HIERONYMUS and DOUGLAS A. KASH
Plaintiff:
ROLLIE MONTEZ MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JOHNSON v EARLY et al
as 1:2010cv01474
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPT, STEPHON BLACKWELL, KEVIN EARLY and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Early et al
as 3:2010cv00477
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson
Defendant:
Kevin Early, Anderson Police Dept, Stephon Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
