Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEILIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
MORGAN NEILIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKWELL v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BLACKWELL
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, MRS. HUNTLEY and MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUMBS v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv18864
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ, MS. BLACKWELL and D.K. WHITE
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN J. GUMBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLACKWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv17216
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
RONALD BLACKWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PUTNEY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv15716
Defendant:
SCO. CLARK, SGT. GILBERT, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PUTNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKWELL v. COHEN et al
as 1:2016cv05342
Plaintiff:
INSPIRATION BLACKWELL
Defendant:
GERALDINE COHEN, ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY MEDICAL STAFF, ATLANTIC COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKWELL v. HASTINGS
as 3:2011cv05131
Petitioner:
HENRY L. BLACKWELL
Respondent:
BEVERLY HASTINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACKWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv00550
Petitioner:
RONALD BLACKWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WILSON v. BLACKWELL et al
as 3:2007cv04141
Petitioner:
DAWN WILSON
Respondent:
CHARLOTTE BLACKWELL and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
