Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Blair v. St. Louis County Justice Center
as 4:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jered Christopher Blair
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Downing et al
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Harmon
Defendant:
Alexander L. Downing, Unknown Wells, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urban v. Warden Blair
as 2:2023cv04070
Petitioner:
Joshua Robert Urban
Respondent:
Warden Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Carver et al
as 4:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Kevin Moore Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Charles Carver, Sgt. Alex Downy, Cheryl Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Diamond-Donnell D. Blair
Defendant:
Allen Hughes, Michael Miller, Jason Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair et al v. Boyer et al
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Diamond-Donnell D. Blair and William C. Blair
Defendant:
Brian Boyer, Anne Precythe, Jeff Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Libertus v. Harris et al
as 4:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Libertus
Defendant:
Peyton Keener Harris, Michael Thompson, Taylor Bort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majors v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
Dillonger John Majors
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Paul Blair, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Blair
as 4:2022cv00563
Petitioner:
Arieon D. Ford
Respondent:
Paul Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corley v. Blair
as 4:2022cv00250
Petitioner:
Jerrod Corley
Respondent:
Paul Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
