Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 1:2024cv20375
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Rushing v. Williamson et al
as 8:2022cv02817
Plaintiff:
Carla Laverne Rushing
Defendant:
Rachelle Williamson, Douglas Roberts, Neil Whiteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. Salaman et al
as 8:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Carla L. Rushing
Defendant:
Krystal Salaman, Ashley Blue, Douglas Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Dimmig et al
as 8:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Grace Bowles, Brian W. Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lancaster v. Jones et al
as 3:2021cv00559
Defendant:
K Bowles, Dakota Bell, Jason Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBlanc v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2019cv62582
Defendant:
Michael J. Satz, Broward County Sheriff's Office, Gregory Tony and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBlanc v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2019cv62513
Defendant:
State of Florida, Broward County Sheriff Office, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Bowles et al
as 8:2019cv02512
Defendant:
Grace Bowles, Lauren Perry, Dwayne Durden and others
Plaintiff:
Jamil Eugene Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. Inch et al
as 3:2019cv00936
Respondent:
Attorney General Ashley Moody and Secretary Mark S. Inch
Petitioner:
Gary Ray Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOWLES v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2019cv00319
Defendant:
JULIA MCCALL, ASHLEY MOODY, MELINDA COONROD and others
Plaintiff:
GARY RAY BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
