Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Jacobsen #353588 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
Craig Leslie Jacobsen, Jr.
Defendant:
NaphCare, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Grill et al
as 2:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis and Baylee Samuel Farrell
Defendant:
Steven Grill, Shawn Wead, Jody Bradley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davies v. Wead et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Tobius Davies
Defendant:
S Wead, J Bradley and K Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friddle v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Danny Friddle
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Todd Thomas, M Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kirby v. Cota et al
as 4:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Kirby
Defendant:
Unknown Cota, Unknown Bradley, Unknown Maganelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leen-Whitewater v. Lohman et al
as 2:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
James D Leen-Whitewater
Defendant:
Keith Lohman, Jody Bradley, Jr., Shawn Wead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08179
Plaintiff:
Innocent Bradley
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isenberg v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08329
Plaintiff:
Bradley Isenberg
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kanalulu v. Mendez et al
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Jerome N Kanalulu, Jr.
Defendant:
T Mendez, C Susunkewa, T Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv01195
Petitioner:
John Bradley
Respondent:
Unknown Party and RA Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
