Cases 1 - 10 of 195
James Bradley Haag v. Jeff Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv05111
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Respondent:
Brandon Strobelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01625
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Haag
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Patrick Eaton, Ron Broomfield and T. Ismans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Daniel v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Dajon Daniel
Defendant:
E. Bradley Nelson and Malary Getty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera Guzman v. Kanilowski et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Glyndon Rivera Guzman
Defendant:
Sim von Kanilowski, Summer Stephan, David Uyar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marlon Rene Bradley v. Tracey Johnson
as 5:2023cv01913
Petitioner:
Marlon Rene Bradley
Respondent:
Tracey Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Singh v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Baljit Singh
Defendant:
CDCR, MCSP Staff, Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Bradley v. Price
as 1:2023cv00573
Petitioner:
Steven Bradley
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
