Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Bradley Omar Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. Bates et al
as 4:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Taiwansley C. Jackson
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Bates, Officer Unknown Wallace, Officer Unknown Mercurio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glidewell v. Bradley et al
as 2:2023cv04131
Plaintiff:
Shawn Alan Glidewell
Defendant:
Johnathon Bradley, Nathan Lexa, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Bryon L Griffin
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. State of Missouri
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Wade
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Precythe, et al
as 6:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Johnell A Bell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michele Buckner, Conrad Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. Archibeque et al
as 4:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
William Lee Rich
Defendant:
Adam Bradley Archibeque and Marshall Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Arnott
as 6:2022cv03264
Petitioner:
Bradley Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryson v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
Lyrick Bryson
Defendant:
Jay Cassidy, Brandon Hatch, Austin Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
