Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Mason, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Breckon, et al
as 3:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
Unknown, Michael Breckon, Crystal Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v Breckon, et al.
as 1:2021cv00604
Defendant:
Warden Michael Breckon, Doctor Iheanyichukwu Esochaghi and Captian Hicks, S. D
Plaintiff:
Rytholey Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metcalf v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00177
Defendant:
Christy Jones, Stephen Herrick, Deborah Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Lockhart et al
as 1:2021cv00041
Defendant:
R. Lockhart, C. Harris and Michael Breckon
Plaintiff:
Danny V. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Breckon et al
as 7:2020cv00592
Plaintiff:
Mandriez Spivey
Defendant:
Lt. Bowles, Warden Brekon, Captain Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Northam et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Pocahontas Correctional Center, Ralph Northam, USP Marion, IL. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Aoust v. Breckon et al
as 7:2020cv00522
Defendant:
Ofc. Gilbert, Ofc. Ledford, Ofc. Caudil and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael D'Aoust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berkley v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Christy Jones, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Issac Berkley, III and Isaac Berkley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boughton v. Northan et al
as 1:2020cv00938
Plaintiff:
James R. Boughton, Jr. and Lord Serious Hakim Allah
Defendant:
Melissa Welch, Bernard Morris, Trey Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
