Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Calhoun v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
George Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Oliver Brown
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Hardy Correctional Institution, Wakulla Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faison v. Warden Calhoun Correctional Institution
as 1:2021cv24078
Plaintiff:
Matthew Leo Jackson Faison
Defendant:
Warden Calhoun Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FAISON v. HEATH
as 1:2021cv23574
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FAISON
Defendant:
HARLEN HEATH and WARDEN CALHOUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FAISON v. HEATH
as 5:2021cv00175
Petitioner:
MATTHEW FAISON
Respondent:
HARLEN HEATH and WARDEN CALHOUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Calhoun v. Putnam County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2021cv00419
Defendant:
Joe Wells, Southern Correctional Medicine and Putnam County Sheriff Office
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bewley v. Cook et al
as 3:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Connie Sellers Adams, Tory Calhoun, Patricia Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Billy R Bewley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Calhoun v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00348
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Erick Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stevenson v. C&M Towing et al
as 5:2019cv00558
Defendant:
C&M Towing, Damon Baxley and Thomas Calhoun
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al(Hillsborough)
as 8:2019cv01319
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Craig Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 0287
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
