Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Glidewell v. Bradley et al
as 2:2023cv04131
Plaintiff:
Shawn Alan Glidewell
Defendant:
Johnathon Bradley, Nathan Lexa, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redden v. Callaway County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2023cv04051
Plaintiff:
Brandon Montez Redden
Defendant:
Callaway County Sheriff's Department, Deputy LeBel and Fulton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Callaway County et al
as 4:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Nonley Lane Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Callaway County and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Callaway County Jail and Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2021cv04220
Plaintiff:
Shawn A Rose and Shaun A Rose
Defendant:
Callaway County Jail and Sheriff's Department, Lucas Stassel and Travis Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yancey v. Callaway County Jail
as 2:2020cv04190
Plaintiff:
Darren Bradford Yancey
Defendant:
Callaway County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daily v. Akers et al
as 2:2020cv04154
Defendant:
Robbie, Akers, Clay Chism and others
Plaintiff:
Jerron Lamar Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yancey v. Callaway County Jail
as 4:2020cv00728
Plaintiff:
Darren Bradford Yancey
Defendant:
Callaway County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hite v. Callaway County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv04027
Defendant:
Callaway County Jail, Beck, Relford and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Wayne Hite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daily v. Callaway County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv04004
Plaintiff:
Jerron Lamar Daily
Defendant:
Akers, Harris and Callaway County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Callaway County, Missouri, et al
as 2:2018cv04045
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Cox
Defendant:
Callaway County, Missouri , Callaway County Sheriff's Department , Dennis Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
