Cases 1 - 10 of 16
KORECKY et al v. COUNTY OF OCEAN et al
as 3:2021cv12606
Plaintiff:
ANOTHONY R. KORECKY, TONY O. GONZALEZ and ANTHONY R. KORECKY
Defendant:
NINA L. CHAELTON-HAGEN, MR. TERIZZI, DORIS D'ANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13892
Defendant:
EDWARD T. MCDONNELL, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. COLON et al
as 2:2019cv15379
Defendant:
SGT JOHN POMPONIO, G SANTANA, N STANICKI and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORNHAUSER v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv14569
Plaintiff:
JULIUS KORNHAUSER
Defendant:
CARMEN LATELLA, DR. JAMIE RODRIGUEZ, DR. STACIE MARANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARISH v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv09342
Petitioner:
CARMEN D. PARISH
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEJESUS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08090
Plaintiff:
CARMEN DEJESUS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON-BROWN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv08045
Plaintiff:
CARMEN SAMPSON-BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2016cv01434
Plaintiff:
WILFRED LEE HOLMES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, DAVID W. THOMAS, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
