Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ducksworth v. Bobo et al
as 4:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Nora Ducksworth
Defendant:
J Bobo, Carolyn Walker, J Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jim Hodder v. Ernest Lee, et al
as 13-60888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM ELTON HODDER
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNEST LEE, FAYE NOEL, CAROLYN WILLIS and others
Hodder v. Lee et al
as 4:2013cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jim Elton Hodder
Defendant:
Ernest Lee, Faye Noel, Carolyn Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00005
Petitioner:
Willie Lewis Henry, Jr.
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Ernest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00633
Plaintiff:
Willie Lewis Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Ernest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simelton v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Vernon Simelton
Defendant:
Doris McDonald, James L. Brewer, Eric Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Shorty v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 09-60467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE SHORTY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary, ROBERT STURDIVANT, Correctional Supervisor and others
Shorty v. Epps et al
as 4:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Shorty
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Robert Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fairs v. Hunter et al
as 4:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Bobby T. Fairs
Defendant:
"Unknown" Hunter and Carolyn Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00038
Plaintiff:
Earnest Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, James Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
