Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Neill v. Clerk of the Court, WDMO
as 4:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Clerk of the Court, WDMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chase v. Falkenrath
as 4:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Howard K Chase
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Braden et al
as 4:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Gary Louis Berry
Defendant:
Officer Chase Braden, Officer Bressie, Officer Carollo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCartney v. Curl et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rick L McCartney
Defendant:
Chase Curl, Zack Sebree, Aaron Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenz v. Missouri Department of Corrections - Bonne Terre, MO et al
as 4:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Chase Lorenz
Defendant:
Unknown Downs, Missouri Department of Corrections - Bonne Terre, MO and Dennis Spradling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaertner v. Sowell et al
as 4:2020cv01872
Defendant:
Sharron Williams, 2nd, Madison Hudson, Chase Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Gaertner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stills v. Salem, Missouri Police Dept. et al
as 4:2020cv01099
Defendant:
Joseph Chase, Salem, Missouri Police Dept. and Robert Simpson
Plaintiff:
Troy Alan Stills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase-Alone v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Unknown Bell, Unknown Anderson, Unknown Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Marty Buster Chase-Alone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Chase et al
as 4:2017cv02201
Plaintiff:
Keithlan L. Carter
Defendant:
Joe Chase, Randy Brooks, Salem, MO Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Unknown et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jermanine Smith
Defendant:
Amy Unknown and Chase Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
