Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 434
Strong #834816 v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff: Christopher Strong #834816
Defendant: Unknown Party, Unknown Cook, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong #834816 v. Sandborn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff: Christopher Strong #834816
Defendant: Unknown Sandborn, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Douglas
as 2:2024cv11273
Petitioner: Christopher Sanchez, Sr.
Respondent: Adam Douglas
Staton v. USA
as 2:2024cv11130
Petitioner: Christopher Staton
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McDowell v. Plymouth Township Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv11029
Plaintiff: Danny Eugene McDowell
Defendant: Plymouth Township Police Department, Plymouth Township Police Department, Commissioner of, Plymouth Township Police Department, Chief of and others
Jubenville v. Swanson et al
as 2:2024cv10957
Plaintiff: Todd Jubenville
Defendant: Christopher Swanson, Chittick, Haney and others
Harvey v. Swanson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv10929
Petitioner: Clifford O'Neal Harvey
Respondent: Christopher Swanson
Riedl v. Miniard
as 2:2024cv10752
Petitioner: Christoph Riedl
Respondent: Gary Miniard
Pointer v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner: Kenneth Christopher Pointer
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lay v. Swanson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv10723
Petitioner: Reggie Lamour Lay
Respondent: Christopher Swanson and David S. Leyton

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?